Ideal weight is often referred to as the one you had at the age of 18. And then we can try to save it. But over the next 15-20 years, people usually deviate significantly from the ideal. Is it worth it to make sacrifices and be sure to return to the previous parameters? The realization that you are overweight can lead to depression. And in itself, weight loss should pursue a specific goal – what weight is considered desirable and optimal at a given age?
♥ BY THEME: Can a tea bag be brewed multiple times?
How to Calculate Ideal Weight for Women and Men Based on Age and Height
After all, the body changes over time – its energy consumption decreases by 10% every 10 years of life. Based on these considerations, about 10% of the weight is added to our mass every 10 years. First, these are the same 5-7 kilograms relative to the ideal mass, and then – already relative to the current indicators. So, fat should also be removed carefully, starting from the already mentioned 10%, but already in a year. And it is better to strive not for figure indicators at the distant eighteen years of age, but for calculating your new optimal weight. There are several quite scientific formulas for this. Though they will not give the exact meaning of your idealbut indicate the desired landmark…
♥ BY THEME: Which cottage cheese is better to buy and how to choose it.
Brocca’s formula
Ideal weight for men = (height in centimeters – 100) × 1.15.
Ideal weight for women = (height in centimeters – 110) × 1.15.
This formula is very easy to use. For example, the ideal weight for a woman who is 160 centimeters tall would be (160 – 110) × 1.15 = 57.5 kilograms. This formula is very similar to the classic and uncomplicated “height minus 100” for men and “height minus 110” for women. Brocca’s modern formula can be considered an improved version of the old model. She demanded to be in a certain shape, not taking into account either age or body type. People with heavy bones or massive muscles, women with large breasts or wide hips did not fit into this formula. The old Brocca formula has been reworked, the new version looks more real.
♥ BY THEME: How vegans differ from vegetarians.
Lorentz formula
Ideal weight of a woman = (height in centimeters – 100) – (height in centimeters – 150) / 2.
Ideal weight for a man = (height in centimeters – 100) – (height in centimeters – 150) / 4.
It is no coincidence that this formula is more often used to calculate female weight – it was originally created for the weaker sex, and at first it did not take men into account at all. If you try to calculate in this way the optimal weight of a woman with a height of 170 centimeters, you get the following: (170 – 100) – (170 – 150) / 2 = 70 – 10/2 = 65 kg.
At first glance, the formula may seem too demanding on weight relative to the previous version. Perhaps this formula indicates the optimal weight for an 18-year-old young woman. But such calculations are fully consistent with the body mass index BMI and they can be used. But women with a height above 175 cm should use another option. Those who are also confused by the proposed parameters should also turn to a different formula.
♥ BY THEME: Pedometer for iPhone, or how to count steps, distance and calories without buying accessories and applications.
Table of the maximum allowable body weight of Egorov-Levitsky
This technique does not have one recognized author, and you will not need to use any formulas for the calculation. It is enough just to find out your height and compare your current weight indicators with the proposed table. It does not indicate the ideal weight for the figure, but the maximum allowable for a given height and age.
| Height, cm | 20-29 years old | 30-39 years old | 40-49 years old | 50-59 years old | 60-69 years old | |||||
| husband. | wives | husband. | wives | husband. | wives | husband. | wives | husband. | wives | |
| 148 | 50.8 | 48.4 | 55 | 52.3 | 56.6 | 54,7 | 56 | 53.2 | 53.9 | 52.2 |
| 150 | 51.3 | 48.9 | 56.7 | 53.9 | 58.1 | 56.5 | 58 | 55.7 | 57.3 | 54.8 |
| 152 | 51.3 | 51 | 58.7 | 55 | 61.5 | 59.5 | 61.1 | 57.6 | 60.3 | 55.9 |
| 154 | 55.3 | 53 | 61.6 | 59.1 | 64.5 | 62.4 | 63.8 | 60.2 | 61.9 | 59 |
| 156 | 58.5 | 55.8 | 64.4 | 61.5 | 67.3 | 66 | 65.8 | 62.4 | 63.7 | 60.9 |
| 158 | 61.2 | 58.1 | 67.3 | 64.1 | 70.4 | 67.9 | 68 | 64.5 | 67 | 62.4 |
| 160 | 62.9 | 59.8 | 69.2 | 65.8 | 72.3 | 69.9 | 69.7 | 65.8 | 68.2 | 64.6 |
| 162 | 64.6 | 61.6 | 71 | 68.5 | 74.4 | 72.7 | 72.7 | 68.7 | 69.1 | 66.5 |
| 164 | 67.3 | 63.6 | 73.9 | 70.8 | 77.2 | 74 | 75.6 | 72 | 72.2 | 70 |
| 166 | 68.8 | 65.2 | 74.5 | 71.8 | 78 | 76.5 | 76.3 | 73.8 | 74.3 | 71.3 |
| 168 | 70.8 | 68.5 | 76.3 | 73,7 | 79.6 | 78.2 | 77.9 | 74.8 | 76 | 73.3 |
| 170 | 72.7 | 69.2 | 77.7 | 75.8 | 81 | 79.8 | 79.6 | 76.8 | 76.9 | 75 |
| 172 | 74.1 | 72.8 | 79.3 | 77 | 82.8 | 81,7 | 81.1 | 77.7 | 78.3 | 76.3 |
| 174 | 77.5 | 74.3 | 80.8 | 79 | 84.4 | 83.7 | 83 | 79.4 | 79.3 | 78 |
| 176 | 80.8 | 76.8 | 83.3 | 79.9 | 86 | 84.6 | 84.1 | 80.5 | 81.9 | 79.1 |
| 178 | 83 | 78.2 | 85.6 | 82.4 | 88 | 86.1 | 86.5 | 82.4 | 82.8 | 80.9 |
| 180 | 85.1 | 80.9 | 88 | 83.9 | 89.9 | 88.1 | 87.5 | 84.1 | 84.4 | 81.6 |
| 182 | 87.2 | 83.3 | 90.6 | 87.7 | 91.4 | 89.3 | 89.5 | 86.5 | 85.4 | 82.9 |
| 184 | 89.1 | 85.5 | 92 | 89.4 | 92.9 | 90.9 | 91.6 | 87.4 | 88 | 85.9 |
| 186 | 93.1 | 89.2 | 95 | 91 | 96.6 | 92.9 | 92.8 | 89.6 | 89 | 87.3 |
| 188 | 95.8 | 91.8 | 97 | 94.4 | 98 | 95.8 | 95 | 91.5 | 91.5 | 88.8 |
| 190 | 97.1 | 92.3 | 99.5 | 95.6 | 100.7 | 97.4 | 99.4 | 95.6 | 94.8 | 92.9 |
Based on the data in the table, we have that if a man in his 40s with a height of 178 cm weighs 87 kg, then this is quite normal, since it is less than the permissible threshold. When compiling this table, both gender, age and height were taken into account. But we don’t see the lower limit of the weight here. But after all, the table is intended to identify the fact of excess weight, and not its lack. This approach can be considered the most complete and balanced.
♥ BY THEME: What is the difference between olives and olives and what is healthier?
Quetelet index (permissible body weight)
Index = weight in grams / height in centimeters.
This method also allows you to assess the existing height relative to the classic body mass index (BMI) described below. And the author of the two approaches is the same. The result obtained must be compared with the table, which also takes into account the physique. And to determine its type is quite simple – you need to stand in front of a mirror, draw in your stomach as much as possible and attach two rulers or just palms to a pair of lower ribs. This forms an angle. If it is dull, more than 90 degrees, then the physique can be considered large. If the angle is close to right, then the physique is normal. An acute angle gives reason to consider you thin.
|
Age |
Body type |
|||||
|
large |
normal |
skinny |
||||
| Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women | |
| 26-39 years old | 390-430 | 380-420 | 350-390 | 340-380 | 340-350 | 330-340 |
| from 40 years old | Up to 450 | Up to 440 | Up to 410 | Up to 400 | Up to 370 | Up to 360 |
So, if a 40-year-old woman of normal constitution with a height of 170 cm weighs 60 kg, then her weight-height index will be 60,000 / 170 = 352 units. Judging by the table, this is a perfectly acceptable ratio of weight, height and age. But if a woman were thinner, she might find herself overweight.
The formula inspires confidence with its ability to take into account many factors: height, physique, age. This method of calculation can be used for any height, only it is worthwhile to objectively approach the assessment of your physique. And approaching the upper bar of the boundary index by 5-10 points is already a reason to think about your diet and activity regimen. Perhaps you need to start moving more.
♥ BY THEME: Cardiio: Heart Rate, or how to measure your heart rate using an iPhone without buying additional devices.
Quetelet calculation or body mass index (BMI)
Body mass index (BMI): weight in kilograms / (height in meters × height in meters).
Using this formula, you can estimate the existing weight and understand in which direction you need to change it. The result obtained must be compared with the table (below).
For example, a woman’s BMI with a height of 165 cm and a weight of 72 kg would be 72 / (1.65 x 1.65) = 26.44. Weight can already be considered excessive, nevertheless, obesity is quite a long way off. In this state, it is no longer worth gaining weight, but it is also better to lose weight by a few kilograms.
Height to weight ratio |
Body mass index |
| Lack of body weight (deficiency) | less than 18.5 |
| Norm | 18.5-25 |
| Overweight, overweight | 25-30 |
| Obesity | 30–35 |
| Severe obesity | 35-40 |
| Very severe obesity | more than 40 |
When reconciling your weight with the BMI table, it is worth knowing some of its features, which are usually not mentioned anywhere. The formula is well suited for people of average height (for men it is 168 – 188 cm, and for women – 154 – 174 cm). If a person is below these limits, then his ideal weight will be 10% less than that indicated in the table, and for tall ones – 10% more. And this formula may incorrectly evaluate people who are actively involved in fitness more than 3 times a week. Also, this calculation does not take into account the sex of a person and age-related changes that occur with our body. And the indisputable advantage of BMI is that it does not try to instill a certain ideal, but objectively estimates weight based on real height.
♥ BY THEME: Why are red-haired people born and how they differ from the rest.
Conclusion
It is easy to see that there are several formulas or tables for determining the optimal weight for you at once. In any case, the result obtained cannot be considered an absolute truth, the indicators will be approximate and estimated. From the fact that some formula considers you thin, you will not automatically fit into tight jeans. You need to listen to your body. If he whispers about a couple of extra pounds, it’s time to take up dumbbells and try on sneakers, and forget the road to the refrigerator.
See also:
